User Name
Tags:
bold
: [b]bold[/b]
italics
: [i]italics[/i]
emphasis
: [em]emphasis[/em]
underline
: [u]underline[/u]
small
: [small]small[/small]
Link
: [url=http://www.google.com]Link[/url]
[img=https://www.hcs64.com/images/mm1.png]
Password
Subject
Message
@furrybob - [url=https://www.sendspace.com/file/0v4f3y]example[/url]. It's an HCA inside an AIX though. Now that I think about it maybe I compared vs an earlier HCA decoder instead of CRI tools; sounds strange with clHCA anyway. I see what you mean now. XMA doesn't even qualify then, since it's just WMA Pro with very minor config. A note, [url=https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/blob/master/libavcodec/wmaprodec.c]FFmpeg's WMA Pro/XMA[/url] decoding seems very accurate, comparing waveform/samples (maybe they just RE'd xmaencode.exe or xWMAEncode.exe), but gets wrong sample counts (encoder delay, last frame). While FFmpeg's ATRAC3 seemed not very accurate, and ATRAC3plus was ok-ish.
HCS Forum Index
Halley's Comet Software
forum source