Previous Page | Next Page

by punk7890-2 at 8:50 AM EST on February 28, 2015
Not sure if its the usf set itself or what, but just thought I'd point out a few weird clicks occur in Extreme G still. Can be heard on Race 5 and Race 8 tracks.
Also, you don't have to trouble yourself over that one Jet Force Gemini track.

edited 6:40 PM EST February 28, 2015
by kode54 at 2:44 PM EST on February 28, 2015
No, but it would help the emulation cause if that were fixed for HLE RSP, because default installs of Mupen64plus only use HLE, not an actual RSP emulator.
by dogman91x at 4:46 AM EST on March 1, 2015
I have to say again I really appreciate you working on this, kode. Thank you!

edited 9:54 AM EST March 1, 2015
by punk7890-2 at 9:25 AM EST on March 1, 2015
Don't mean to be a bother, but from my understanding is this resampler in sinc mode? I personally think its much better when resampling 22Hz songs using Cubic resample option since sinc doesn't mirror the lower frequencies. Would it be possible to add Cubic at least?

There's also a small bug when unselecting the resample option as it doesn't let you.
by kode54 at 4:23 PM EST on March 1, 2015
You want it to add frequencies that aren't there in the original signal? Does anybody know what the N64 actually does when playing lower sample rates? I strongly doubt that the DAC had a built in cubic resampler.
by punk7890-2 at 6:04 PM EST on March 1, 2015
To best describe what I mean, I think your Multi-resampler does just this when setting it to Cubic. I think Jabo's audio plug-in for Project 64 does something similar to what I'm talking about also.
I think it would be more efficient to do it this way rather the switch between Multi-resampler at Cubic set at 44100Hz for lower frequencies (22Hz).

From my experience, its much nicer on the ears. Hopefully that makes sense as I'm not technically inclined in this matter.
by kode54 at 9:40 PM EST on March 1, 2015
Cubic resampling it is, then.
by dogman91x at 7:28 AM EST on March 2, 2015
Kind of off-topic: I got the latest build (3/2/2014) off kode54's homepage; and if you all take the time to listen, you'll notice the resampler audibly decreases the fidelity of the USF playback when compared back to back with the original sample rate. So, that should shut people up about resampling making it "better". :P

To be fair though, with the SoX resampler you can't even hear the difference; depends on the algorithm.
by TheUltimateKoopa at 8:23 AM EST on March 2, 2015
Is "lazyusf2" the same as "foo_input_usf"?
http://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_input_usf

edited 1:31 PM EST March 2, 2015
by punk7890-2 at 9:30 AM EST on March 2, 2015
Excellent! Thanks kode for your hard work.

edited 3:54 PM EST March 2, 2015

Previous Page | Next Page
Go to Page 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Search this thread

Show all threads

Reply to this thread:

User Name Tags:

bold: [b]bold[/b]
italics: [i]italics[/i]
emphasis: [em]emphasis[/em]
underline: [u]underline[/u]
small: [small]small[/small]
Link: [url=http://www.google.com]Link[/url]

[img=https://www.hcs64.com/images/mm1.png]
Password
Subject
Message

HCS Forum Index
Halley's Comet Software
forum source