Previous Page | Next Page

by Mouser X at 1:02 AM EST on January 20, 2012
I am posting here, because I feel it is appropriate to provide a teaching lesson at this time. If you want to make enemies, then please see the previous post. It's a great example to all.

Seriously, if you want to be mean to Knurek, and offend him, that's your thing. However, that message is offensive to read at all. I have absolutely nothing to do with this stupid argument, and you're post makes me hate you just for that alone. That was a really lousy move. If you want people to actually respect you, or even listen to you, you *NEVER* respond that way, regardless of the situation. If someone says to you "YOU'RE A FREAK OF NATURE!!!! If you died in a fire, slowly, you'd be doing the world a favor! (throw in about 20 expletives for good flavor)" You don't respond in kind. Doing so only validates them. Instead, acknowledge their opinion. Tell them you appreciate any advice on how to improve (aside from suicide, preferably). In this instance, provide counter-proof. So, his picture is "bogus"? How so? Perhaps you could post exactly in what ways Knurek could be mistaken? Post some pictures of your own, illustrating your exact point (preferably with the above example, since people are already "familiar" with it, due to Knurek's picture). I read these forums daily, and it's noticeable to me that you don't seem to be entirely popular. With the attitude that post shows, it's blatantly obvious to me why people don't like you.... And that's entirely ignoring any rips of any kind whatsoever. Just your attitude alone is reason enough for someone to not like you. Want to change that? Do you want people to stop looking for reasons to dislike you? Then stop giving them things to look for! Be nice, even if they aren't.

Normally, I would make an effort to restate your post in such a way as to make it useful, instead of offensive. However, unfortunately for me, my imagination is too vivid, and the imagery you use is too much for me to even consider the attempt. Seriously, as far as I'm concerned, regardless of whether you're right or not, regardless of whether your rips are legitimate or not, you have failed as a human being. I have always tried to maintain a neutral "tone" when reading posts here, and thus have tried to consider all posters as a person worth paying attention to (or at the least, with "not ignoring" them), but from now on, you've lost all of that from me. Even if you do prove that Knurek is wrong, even if you prove that Knurek is a psychotic mental patient whose level of stupidity is so bad, that his IQ levels are in the negatives, I won't listen to you. You've destroyed all respect I have had for you. Good luck on having anyone listen to you, after that mindless tirade.

Thanks a lot, jerk. Yes, this is one of the "worst" posts I've made in a long while. But if it offends anyone, at least it won't be to the general populace. It should only be one person who might take offense at this, and that person deserves it, as far as I'm concerned. Mouser X out.

edited 1:04 AM EST January 20, 2012
by arbingordon at 2:32 AM EST on January 20, 2012
nenson is a 'tard, what else is new?
by Knurek at 10:04 AM EST on January 20, 2012
@nenson: Honestly, if you knew anything about low-level music ripping, maybe you could pull off a theft like that - put the init code after the music data, change the load address accordingly. Size optimize the rip, since GBgbs doesn't do that at all. Write your own custom init code that doesn't reek of something being written with the 1200+ GBgbs rips in mind.

You know, things that require actual coding/hacking skill.

What you did though, is just change the GBgbs init function label (INITDATAGB) to your nick. That's whole of your 'ripping' process, hex-editing few bytes of unneeded data to, unsuccessfully I might add, mask your theft.

Oh no, sorry, you also changed the song order table for the Yakuman rip. Right, that's another 4-5 bytes you had to reorder in the file.

Obviously, a feat like that should be enough to give you credit for the whole process, right?

Honestly, I don't care what you do with your time - there are enough bigger idiots on the Internet. The only reason I posted this at all, is because your ineptitude here is so damn hilarious, and I was sure some members here would get a kick out of it as well.
by nensondubois at 11:19 AM EST on January 20, 2012
Whatever, you can write paragraphs all you want, the proof is there. I am no longer going to reply to this idiocy.

Did you even look at my code? I even said I'd make a tutorial on HOW TO RIP A GBS!

I offered proof and you all refuse to accept it. Not my problem. Bye. There's not much more to say or prove unless you can think of something, of course, I'm open to put this to rest.

edited 12:02 PM EST January 20, 2012
by bxaimc at 5:30 PM EST on January 20, 2012
BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRNNNNNNN

The only reason I posted this at all, is because your ineptitude here is so damn hilarious, and I was sure some members here would get a kick out of it as well.

hahaha we sure did
by Dais! at 9:23 PM EST on January 20, 2012
thanks guys
by Lunar at 10:13 AM EST on January 23, 2012
lulz

It makes no difference to me how soundtracks get ripped. It's about getting the music, not about showing off your hacking chops. That said I don't see any reason to be dishonest.

I didn't realise there was even any way to automatically rip GBS files so it's news to me.
by Knurek at 4:35 AM EST on January 24, 2012
Let's just say that uberManly is entering testing phase at this moment.

I suggest you all check your testosterone levels. :)
by Electric Keet at 5:28 PM EST on January 24, 2012
Er.... mine are rock-bottom. Is the testosterone a hard requirement, or just suggested system specs?

I can emulate testosterone, anyhow. I'll just start typing like you lot, and arguing a whole bunch.
by snakemeat at 9:48 PM EST on January 24, 2012
Let's just say that uberManly is entering testing phase at this moment.

Oh dear, Uber Manley V8 Super Oil Clam Zero Angel Gaiden.

Raging Testosterone.

Previous Page | Next Page
Go to Page 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217

Search this thread

Show all threads

Reply to this thread:

User Name Tags:

bold: [b]bold[/b]
italics: [i]italics[/i]
emphasis: [em]emphasis[/em]
underline: [u]underline[/u]
small: [small]small[/small]
Link: [url=http://www.google.com]Link[/url]

[img=https://www.hcs64.com/images/mm1.png]
Password
Subject
Message

HCS Forum Index
Halley's Comet Software
forum source
Generated in 0.0258s;